Tuesday, August 11, 2009
Op - Ed Entry Six
Can You Eat in Bed?
By: Maureen Dowd
Published: August 1,2009
Nora Ephron is the current director of the big screen movie “Julie & Julia.” Nora Ephron is a “competent cook” herself and in this interview with Maureen Dowd they discuss the importance of food in life. She reveals that the only reason 21 Century Fox previous owner Joe Roth only let her make the movie “Julie & Julia” because “[She] told him exactly what to order (the cabbage borscht, which [he found] delicious).” When asked “Do couples that cook together stay together?” she declares “No. I have cooked with men I am no longer married to.” Nora Ephron is candid and straight forward in her interview. She promotes cooking and food as more than an ingredient to life; but rather the main course.
Maureen Dowd does a fantastic job of asking questions that lets you get to know Nora Ephron better and gets you answers to lingering questions you might from her previous interviews. The interview is light, entertaining, and rather humorous so much so that you even find that you silently chuckle to yourself. Maureen Dowd always finds a way to write interesting articles even when it’s an interview. She rarely, ever fails to show how brilliant she is and in this interview she far from fails. Maureen Dowd is a wonderfully marvelous writer and this interview is a laid back read.
Monday, August 10, 2009
North Korea’s Nuclear Blackmail by: Henry A. Kissinger
Kissinger’s article points out the obvious contradicting messages being sent by the United States of Americas’ government. It is agreed upon that American citizens travel live across the globe, none of them are in harms way. With the bargain made with North Korea, foreign policies could easily hold hostage any citizen and get their way as long as they have enough nuclear weapons developed to destruct billions of lives. This specific instigation should be a worry for the American government. The government is inadvertently persuading cultures to create more bombs that are perceived to be threatening if they were to capture U.S citizens.
My personal taste of writing does not find this article sweet in any manor. The article lacks in substance and facts of the previous event. Furthermore, it fails to explain the significance behind Kissinger’s arguments. In spite of the intensity of a hostage situation, Kissinger weasels his opinions into downplaying the importance of a super-hero government.
Krugman writes with very convincing evidence and distinctions, but I believe there are other contributing factors that made the impacts of this recession much less devastating than the Great Depression. First, is that economics have became an international business. International trade and economic relations allow countries to help each other out. Second, is that this recession deals only with economic, while the depression of the 30s dealt with far more problems. The distinction between a recession and depression is that depression is defined by the lack of production and more towards the material wealth of a nation. Back in 1930s the dust bowl and many factory close downs resulted in depression. None of that is happening now.
I agree with Eric Zencey. The way we measure the economy isn't the best. People using more 'green' ways or doing things themselves are not registering to the progress. It isn't being noticed at all. But all of these life choices are good for everything. If there is a positive effect of an action, and it isn't being recognised, then the choice of measurement is extremely off. On the other hand, I see no way how something like hanging your clothes out to dry instead of using a dryer, can be measured. Who would even know and how would they find out? They wouldn't. So even though the process is inaccurate, it's realistic.
The author of this opinion editorial seemed very dismayed by the news she received before writing the article. Her voice seemed disappointed in her country's government and I don't blame her. I personally agree with the article because you would imagine that in such a time of need the government would feel even the slightest bit of sympathy. However, that is not the case. In my opinion, I believe President Obama should be rallying for people's support because even though he won the election, many people are still against him. A good and beneficial way for him to gain respect and leadership value to Americans would be to give some people a break. In the article, the author mentions a Vietnam war veteran who was shot in the back during the war and now cannot work. The government benefits and pension are not doing enough for him because he still has to sleep on the sidewalk. In my opinion, the government should just give everyone in need a break for now.
Glanville's article is entertaining as well as convincing. He passionately supports the confidentiality rights of professional baseball players but at the same time he successfully appeals to the American public by agreeing that steroids have had a negative effect on how the game is watched and played. The ex-pro baseball player discourages the use of enhancement steroids, but defends the players' basic rights. "Confidential, With an Asterisk" is a well planned and carefully written article that is able to provide readers with new and captivating information.
E.R's May Be the First Victims
This article is about the growing problems in Hospitals. The problem is to many patients being in the emergency room at once. The author of this article is Eric Toner. Many patients in the emergency rooms are in the hospital with mild symptoms of the H1N1 flu. They really do not need to be in the emergency room and can treat their symptoms with over the counter medicine and rest. Most of the cases are lower levels of the flu and do not require hospital care. If they did not go to the hospitals, the emergency rooms can be less crowded and provide more and quicker care to patients who really need serious medical attention. Some communities should educate the public about the flu and how to treat it. They should teach citizens how to know when he or she should go to the hospital and when not to. Communities should also set up flu centers to help flu patients directly instead of sending the patients to hospitals. Another possible solution is having hospitals work together to send patients evenly to each hospital.
The writer wrote an informative and persuasive essay with a clear problem stated. Eric clearly states the present problem at the beginning of the article. Then he states multiple solutions to the problem throughout the article. With each solution he specifically states why he thinks this should occur and how the public could arrange it to happen. Eric’s writing is very precise and informative. He creates a clear picture of what is going on and what should change. This essay has a very serious public problem within it and very good possible solutions to the problem as well
By Timothy Egan
Op Ed Entry #6
Republicans and democrats have clashed throughout history when regarding the role of government in the private sector. Conservatives are supportive of minimal government interference in private corporations. Liberals have a different approach, as they are more open to government imposition on private enterprise. Timothy Egan, in the article Clunker Class War, has accused the Republicans of disapproving the “Cash for Clunkers” program because it is working. “They hate it, many of these Republicans, because it’s a huge hit. It’s working as planned, and this cannot stand. America must fail in order for President Obama to fail.” Wrong. Conservatives don’t want the President to fail. They just know he will because government intervention is for the Soviets. Granted, the “Cash for Clunkers” program is a creative way to jump-start the currently dormant economy. However, government should not sponsor such an event, nor should it redistribute taxpayer money to fund it. Despite each party’s conflicting opinions on government involvement in our economy, redistribution of wealth is simply…socialism. Republicans and Democrats are Americans-- plain and simple. America was built on competition in the marketplace motivated by the hunger to live the American dream. Once government enters the private market, we will essentially be the U.S.S.R. “Cash for Clunkers” would be more effective if the car companies sponsored and funded it, but a taxpayer should not be responsible for paying for someone else’s new car. Republicans disapprove of this program, not because it is working (also questionable). Rather, because government facilitated programs designed to revive the economy represent socialist ideals. If you prefer socialism, move to Europe (no offense).
Timothy Egan wrote Clunker Class War out of spite towards Republicans, and rightfully so, for Democrats have received their share of criticism. As a result, Egan focused on his argument and not his rhetoric. The article is neither formal nor clear. Jumping from argument to argument, the article was written quickly and petulantly. The article presented many facts, yet Egan’s emotions were excessive and overpowering. The format of the article seemed to parallel his thought process. The paragraphs were short and abrupt, not in any specific order. Argument after argument, the author critiqued the Bush Administration (once again, rightfully so as the criticism goes both ways). His facts, however, were jumbled and not pertinent to his arguments. He assimilated many random situations and contorted them to fit his argument. For example, he criticized Bush’s $700 billion bank bailout. This bailout was to prevent global economic collapse, and was funded by many countries around the world. Democrats misinterpreted the bailout, and for once supported Bush!
10 August 2009
“Women at Risk” by Bob Herbert emphasizes the hidden discriminatory violence towards women that permeates America. I am a feminist myself, and even I did not connect the dots with current events to realize that many mass killings target women in some way. The fact that many recent mass killings have some root in misogyny is a very shocking truth. Herbert also brings up an interesting point when he notes that if that many massacres targeted a race or ethnic group, news stations and political figures would make that information widespread. Dissecting modern and horrific examples, Herbert pulls in and convinces the reader that women are the targets of many hate crimes. While scrolling through the opinion editorials, I usually do not find articles about women’s rights. “Women at Risk” is not only a slight shock to me but also a delight because Herbert supports women so well. This article does an excellent job of speaking up on women's rights in America that are still, despite popular belief, restricted. An interesting part of this article is that Bob Herbert, a male, is the author. The fact that a male is writing an article about women’s rights shows that, although there is much sexism in America and the world, some people other than feminists are starting to realize this and do something about it.
Not only does “Women at Risk” sport some well-developed ideas, it also flaunts literary excellence. The article starts off with a quote that is the epitome of what this article is about, hate against women. Right from the beginning Herbert shows us sexism in modern America, something people easily overlook. He uses this quote to envelope the readers into this world of sexism. What makes this work so well is his follow through. Herbert does not stop at that one profound example; he takes his ideas deeper and deeper, adding and analyzing more examples as he continues through his article. All of his examples are solid, and all of his support is thorough. Herbert does a good job of using different sentence and paragraph lengths. He does seem to use more short paragraphs than most other writers but does it in a way that complements his ideas and writing.
Sunday, August 9, 2009
In the article, Kristof give a simple 10-step guide on how to recharge your soul by enjoying a nice camping trip with your family. Some of the steps Kristof includes are: take the path less traveled, wear an old pair of running shoes, skip a tent and a change of clothes, use hiking poles if necessary, and most importantly, avoid bears. Kristof provides these steps in order to encourage people to spend time in the outdoors. He provides people with advice that will make it fun and enjoyable. Personally, I have been hiking but never been camping. After reading this article I have a greater desire to get off the couch and into the wilderness. Kristof makes camping sound fun and adventurous. Kristof concludes by saying: “So before the summer ends, try overcoming nature deficit syndrome and recharging your soul- and happy trails!”
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
By: Aluf Benn
In this article, Aluf Benn (an editor for an Israeli newspaper) asks the question of why Obama has not talked to Israel directly as he has to other nations. Because of this, the Israeli view of Obama is of his demands (of various settlements involving the ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine). This view of Obama hurts his image and of the country. In a survey of Israelis, 50% believed that the Obama administration is pro-Palestine. Only 6% believed they were pro-Israel. Because of this, the nation as a whole is not willing to give up anything to Palestine to achieve peace. Thus, the Israeli Prime Minister doesn’t feel any pressure to end the situation from his own people. Benn goes on to say that one explanation for this behavior is as follows: During the Clinton and Bush years, Israel was a close ally of the US and the US and Israel worked together to build a peace plan for the Middle East. But, then when Israel went into controversial military operations, the US stood back. This made Israel happy and content, but the European and Middle Eastern allies mad. To repair these damaged relationships, Obama could try to look like the opposite of his predecessor. Thus, he is now ignoring Israel. Also, Benn shares that the view of most Israelis is that Obama is a softie and is trying to make friends with everyone (even after being embarrassed by Iran and North Korea). This policy of not talking has led the Israelis to harden their minds and stay closers to their leader’s ways than of these new talks peace.
Aluf Benn writes this article as if a FYI to Obama of what his not-talking is doing to the relations in Israel. The ignoring of Israel (either intended or not) does not help Obama’s plan for peace between Israel and Palestine. Mr. Benn first presents the problem that he sees. Then he backs it up with solid evidence. After he presents his evidence, he then puts himself in the Americans shoes, to give an explanation of how Obama came to the conclusion that he needs to ignore Israel. Once he set the stage for Obama’s recent actions, he then gives five distinct examples of how Obama has misinterpreted Israeli behavior. For his conclusion… he doesn’t really have one. At the end he simply hangs all that he has to say out, but also declares that maybe he is wrong and Obama is right. It seems a strange way to end an article but as a newspaper editor, I think he knows more than me. Either way, it still makes an interesting article and I believe the point will be well received. As for Obama, I think as a PR specialist, I think he will take this criticism well and manage the situation to the best of his abilities.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Science is in the Details
By: Sam Harris
In his article, Sam Harris steps outside the line to attack Francis Collins’ way of thinking and try to win people over to his side (him being the author of The End of Faith). In this article he first lays out all that Mr. Collins has accomplished (like leading the Genome Project) to then question his compatibility for the job of head of the National Institute of Health. Harris explains what Collins believes by using his slide show that he showed a group of students at the University of California at Berkeley. In short, what Harris finds troubling is the fact that God, at the particular time in evolutionary history, gave man a soul, free will, and the knowledge of good and evil. This small belief which has had no affect on his success in the past is a serious concern to Harris because Mr. Collins will be in charge of a $30 billion health budget and will be representing the USA. Harris then goes on the subtly call anyone who believes in anything but total evolution an idiot. He compares it to understanding that there are particles in air. That it may be hard to understand, but we higher level people know it to be true. Also, thinking like a scientist is at the very hardest with religion. Harris is worried that Collins’ religion will not allow him to accept the truth in certain situations. That when confronted with a new scientific truth, that he will just insist it is God’s doing and can not fully understand it.
In this article, Harris basically just attacks Collins’ views and tries to make his ideas seem immature. He writes by starting out stating his concern, then giving some facts, informing us why we should be concerned, and then finally ending it by making it seem that Obama has made a very bad decision. I believe that this article is unreasonable and unnecessary. First of all, Mr. Collins has accomplished a ton in his scientific career and his faith has never held him back. This is a minor issue in this country if that. I can’t believe that there are many other people out there like him (as his says) that are losing sleep about such an issue. Even with Harris’ doubts, Mr. Collins will do very well in his position.
Michael Hayden director of the C.I.A
In this article Mr. Hayden comments about the various criticism that the National Security Agency and specifically the Surveillance Program has gotten. He argues that the program was effective, lawful and necessary. The first concern he addresses is that the many levels of the program hurt its effectiveness. Because of the many levels of classification, what information professionals call “connecting the dots” did not happen during the 9/11 attack. Hayden agrees that this can be an issue, but it is completely necessary to insure the safety of the country. The next claim he tackles is that Congress was not aware of the full capability of such a program. Hayden says that actually, Congress could not use the program to its full extent because of the restriction placed on the program by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. When he briefed Congress in 2001 through 2005, he continuously made the point that the CIA could not fully act under these restrictions. The next topic he deals with (and most likely the most discussed) is the lawfulness of this program. In response he first says that agency lawyers assisted in the review of the program. Lastly, Hayden addresses the people that believe that their personal lives are being invaded by this program. He assures these people that any wiretapping done is done with Congress in the loop. Also, he mentions that in a recent review the reviewer noted that the program has had: “No evidence of intentional misuse”. In his final words he stresses that he tells his men that since this is a sensitive issue, they must do exactly what the President says and nothing more.
Michael Hayden writes in a very direct manor. He essentially is writing a 5 paragraph essay. He has an introduction, he proves that the program is effective, necessary, and lawful and finishes off with the conclusion. It seems that he somewhat aggravated with all of these claims and is now happy to clear up all confusion. He writes a manor to quickly address the concerns and answer all complaints that he has heard. As the head of the CIA, I think he might know something about what he is talking about. It is good that someone as high up as him can talk to a large amount of people to clear up their concerns.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Keillor's article seems scatter-brained and poorly organized. He begins to address intriguing ideas but fails to follow though. The article begins to read like a personal journal, causing the reader to be slightly repulsed by the sensuality of his memories. His personal reflections do not connect well with the rest of the work and do not belong in an opinion-editorial article. Keillor has the potential to be a skillful author but needs develop his organizational skills. Despite its flaws, "The Angel's Cocktail"presents interesting concepts and shows potential for a meaningful article.
Ehrenreich is a proven and successful author whose most recent op-ed article is compelling and enlightening. Her use of personal experiences and direct quotations bring the stories of the "already poor" to life and reveal the true victims of the recession. Ehrenreich's article contains many quotations for those who are suffering, revealing a type of heartbreak and desperation that is typically hidden by today's mainstream media. "Too Poor to Make the News" is a stunningly unique and beautiful work that should be read and appreciated by all are attempting to thrive in this financially trying time.
The opinion-editorial authors of "Overseas, Under the Knife" have done a magnificent job of presenting the positive aspects of oversea medical care but fail to address the possible complications. For instance, the money saved on medical expenses could be quickly used up for purchasing airline tickets to and from the nation in which the hospital is located. Also, when overseas, patients are seperated from their family as well as their routine care doctor. Though the prices may seem tempting, the details of travel expenses and comfort should be considered before opting for overseas care.
Monday, July 27, 2009
By Brent Staples
Op Ed #5
African- American Henry Louis Gates was arrested by Cambridge Police while trying to break in to his house. A Harvard Professor, Gates managed to lock himself out of his own house. Police saw him trying to enter, and, as all cops are trained to do, arrested him. The man furiously insisted that it was his own house and swore at the cops, deeming them racists. This simple misunderstanding turned into a massive ordeal of racial profiling. President Obama jumped into the situation and agreed with the racist accusations when he claimed the Cambridge Police acted, “stupidly.” Brent Staples, author of the article President Obama, Professor Gates and the Cambridge Police and friend of Professor Gates, insisted that the arrest was simply a precaution and in no way racist. However, Staples centered the focus of the article not on the arrest itself, but on racism in general and how this situation will concern President Obama. He asserts that this issue may negatively affect the media’s perspective on Obama’s ideals regarding racism. President Obama did say he may have been harsh, yet he refused to apologize to Cambridge Police. Despite his attempts to justify his previous statement, it is still apparent that Obama’s responsibilities as President do not include criticizing local police for making a precautionary arrest. The threat of nuclear invasion from three countries seems like a more appropriate matter to address as President.
Brent Staples’ article was neither informative nor factual. The lack of facts about Professor Gates’ arrest and Obama’s remarks following the arrest made the article almost pointless. However, he made several points about racism that were pertinent to the case. He admits that racism is still a problem, and it will never just “vanish.” He also addresses the point that racism in America is no longer a force threatening enough to prevent any dream from coming true. African Americans dominate athletics, entertainment, and now the White House. He also insinuates that discrimination is just an excuse. His dramatic claims about racism are controversial, and not supported by fact. This dangerous combination may raise havoc in the media.
As harshly as Greenway accuses Obama for not achieving his hopes in the article, Bad Timing, the assumptions of failure may be rash. “So far, however, Obama has failed on two important fronts.” This statement is highly disagreeable. Failure happens when one throws in the towel before accomplishing their set goals. Obama has not thrown in the towel, stopped his meetings with Netanyahu or Saudi Arabia. It could be compromised on the fact that Obama has faced some hurdles on his way to the finish line, however to use the word failure is a destructive mindset on negotiations. Most negotiations, in fact, are not made without obstacles. Saudi Arabia has their own set of priorities as well as Palestine and without Obama in there influencing things could have gone down hill faster than we could comprehend it.
An element of stance in an op-ed is always admired, however is there a boundary in which something is done tastefully? In truth, the answer is yes. Greenways style of writing is meant to sway an audience to one end of the spectrum or another. While respecting this genius, I disagree. I felt his rights of free speech were taken a little too far with his accusations of failure toward the president of the United States. No, Obama has not had a super-hero-moment but that is not what this globe actually consists of. The media presents society with negatively glamorous shots of different political figures. When reality comes down to the nitty gritty that is not how the earth orbits.
Collins' writes her article with sarcasm and humor. The reader can feel her laughing at who she is writing about, portraying them as idiots, and this makes it more interesting to read. Her view lightens things up and makes it less boring and serious, which is refreshing and needed once in a while. I like reading her articles because all of them seem to have this same theme of sarcasm and laughter about what mess the government is in this time and not many of the other columnists write this way.
I find the information provided within the column is well written about NASA’s space program history and possible future. He provides many historical facts and personal experience to prove his opinion of NASA’s effort and enthusiasm on taking man pass the moon. He states the question about why they are this way, provides his opinion on why and backs it up thoroughly in his column. This is a example of how thorough his reasoning is and why his opinion is the way it is, “Physicists were quick to point out that nobody would choose space as a place from which to attack Earth. The spacecraft, the missile, the Earth itself, plus the Earth’s own rotation, would be traveling at wildly different speeds upon wildly different geometric planes” (Wolfe 1). You can see how thorough his information is and how much he researched this topic. Overall this was a very informative Op-Ed article and I found it interesting to read. Especially since the new rocket is going to replace the Space Shuttle to take man back to the moon sometime next year. This might mean that NASA is going to show more enthusiasm on taken man pass the moon someday.
The issue of driving while on a cellphone has gotten the attention of Hollywood in more than one way. In Will Smith’s “Seven Pounds”, Smith ruins his perfect life when he uses his phone while driving and crashes into another car, killing six strangers and his fiancée. Tony Gilroy, screenwriter for the films “Michael Clayton” and “Duplicity”, was involved in a nightmarish accident when his cell-chatting taxi driver ran a red light and hit another car. Luckily, Gilroy only suffered a fractured rib and hip. The automobile companies are busy fueling America’s self-destructive cravings. One company, Ford, is developing a system that allows drivers to use phones, music players, and the Internet with voice commands and audible responses. Americans are so addicted to their technology that they are willing to risk their life and the lives of others just to answer a stupid message or phone call that could likely wait. The technology industry is like a drug dealer, creating social and economic pressure to stay in constant touch with everyone in our lives, and Americans are addicted.
Warner’s straightforward and to the point writing style made her article very easy to read, and her fact based research was also interesting at the same time. I liked how Warner showed how Gates and Crowley’s testimonies contradicted one another by the way that she used direct quotes from their accounts of that night. Warner used the example of Crowley and Gates to show that the way we act is driven by many things including who we are as people, and who we are as people is in fact conditioned by our race.
William L. Iggiagruk Hensley, the author of this article, seems to be disappointed by ex-governor Palin's choices. He defends the state of Alaska by stating poverty, school drop out rates, and drug and alcohol abuse rates have risen. Hensley also mentions how Palin could have potentially helped the state but instead she abused her power by quitting in the middle of her term.
Hayden did an admirable job of retaining an objective tone throughout his composition. In an editorial regarding a controversial topic, a somewhat detached feel is sometimes useful because angering people rarely succeeds in converting them to one’s beliefs. By reiterating the fact that all sides of the situation must be considered before forming a negative or hostile view on the program, he not only instills trust in readers and increases their undrestanding of the President’s Surveillance Program, but also encourages them to become better decision-makers concerning other contentious matters. Thus, reading the article can be beneficial to readers in many facets. As a result, I would recommend this editorial to those who strongly oppose the program or do not fully understand it, as it may be an effective eyeopener. Hayden’s choice to publish his opinion in the widely-read newspaper highlights the certainty of his beliefs and his eagerness to project them on a national level.
I completely agree with Roger Cohen. The United States always seems to find a way to recover and be stronger than ever. Countries like Germany, who practically self destruct due to genocides and hatred, contain the power to stop, rethink and fix their issues. They may not be the best and the strongest countries,but they all learn from their mistakes and that just makes them stronger.I believe that even the lowest countries can make things work. It's human instinct to not repeat something that hurts them. America has had some issues, but we're still standing. Whether it's our fault or someone elses, we still need to have pride, move on, and repair whatever has been done.
Sunday, July 26, 2009
The New York Times columnists all write arguments with cold hard facts backing them up. Blow wrote his article based on personal experience. I believe these types of writings have both a negative side and a positive side. Writing arguments solely based on personal experience could potentially make the argument bland. The author takes away room for opinions and replaces them with a universal truth, his truth. This creates a lot of bias in the writings that are based on experience. Though that is a severe downside to this kind of writing, but this type of writing is effective in that it allows the author to extract real organic evidence for whatever he or she is advocating. People tend to fully understands things after they experienced it firsthand.
Op-Ed Entry Five
July 26, 2009
Not a Victim, but a Hero
By: Nicholas D. Kristof
Published: July 25, 2006
Assiya Rafiq was only sixteen when she was kidnapped by a group of thugs who for endless years raped and beat her. Then one day they delivered her to the police. She finally thought that all of her suffering was over; but the four police officers that took in Assiya then took turns raping and beating her. In Assiya’s culture the next thing to do would then be to commit suicide “as [it’s] the only way to cleanse the disgrace for her entire family.” Alternatively, Assyia conjured up the courage to fight the abuse; she is currently trying to persecute both her kidnappers and the police even though she’s received threats against herself and her younger sisters. She’s doing this because she “...[doesn’t] want the same thing to happen to anybody else." Assiya isn’t the first person to have such courage. “In 2002 Mukhtar Mai, a young woman from a remote village in Meerwala was ganged raped on the orders of the village officals; she persecuted her attackers and used the compensation money to start a school.” Mukhtar is Assyai’s inspiration.
Assiya’s story started two years ago when a friend of the family sold her to two criminals who have family ties to prominent politicians. Those two men then spent the next two years raping and beating her. The men were linked to a gold robbery, so they struck up a deal with the police; for Assiya and a $625 bribe the police were going to pin the robbery on Assiya. While Assiya was there three police officers and the police chief beat and raped her over the course of the next two weeks. When Assiya’s family heard she was in jail they petitioned the bailiff to get her out, but the police hid Assiya and locked up her ten year old brother which they hoped would bully the family into backing off. The bailiff took bribes from both sides but in the end he let Assiya free. Furious more then shamed Assiya told her story to the Magistrate, who ordered a medical exam and an investigation. Her family is currently $2,500 in debt and has gone into hiding. Her family and life will never be the same but she’s standing up for herself. Assiya’s mother, Iqbal Mai said, “ At first [ I ] had prayed that God not give poor families daughters, but then [ I ] changed [my] mind, God should give poor people daughters like Assiya who will fight.”
To give Mr. Kristof his credit he wrote a fair article on a sincerely stunning act of heroism. Though if I remember correctly if we’ve written a blog post on a columnist previously we’re allowed to comment on the actual article; well I’d like to take that opportunity. For whatever reason this article has inspired so much love in my heart for Assiya Rafiq and her family. Probably because I feel like too many acts of violence much like this are committed not just all over the world but here in America as well. Though instead of standing up for themselves and taking a stand for the respect they deserve girls and woman a like just suffer with the pain or kill themselves. I can’t even begin to imagine how horrific an experience like that must be, but despite the threats on herself and family Assyia has found the courage to stand up and fight. She shows a kind of courage I don’t think I’ve heard of in a very long time. With the princess complex that many girls of my age have (the idea that they need to be saved buy a dashing prince on a great white stallion) it’s refreshing to see something so magnificent. I simply couldn’t read this article and then write about how the style and tone of Mr. Nicholas D. Kristof was simply smashing because it’s not the writing of the article that makes this story so awe-inspiring it’s Assyia Rafiq and her courage that does that all on it’s own.
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Since their inception, cell phones have been considered a driving distraction and danger. Several states have passed legislation which bans drivers from using cell phones. However, headsets have been considered safe alternatives for cell phone use by these state governments and the general public. New research, which had been mysteriously withheld for years, released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration suggests that headsets are just as dangerous as cell phones, implying that conversation is the real distracter. Maureen Dowd explains how dangerous cell phone use is by drivers, and also contends that cell phone use while driving may just be an example of a bigger problem in
Dowd uses the frightening comparison of technology and dangerous drugs to explain exactly how reliant Americans are on various forms of technology. Dowd also uses a personal experience to warn of the dangers of multitasking while driving. She admits her fault while driving, and her meek promise to never use a cell phone while driving again, which she broke. Dowd’s experience provides an anecdote to which other readers can relate, and she uses other personal stories from her friends to prove her point. While her opinion is the general consensus across the country, Dowd’s piece serves as a kind of public service announcement with witty comparisons and pop culture connections. These lighter elements do not detract from her message, however, which is powerful enough to make even the most technology-addicted person hang up the phone while driving. Dowd accomplishes her goal in writing an op-ed which presents the horrifying dangers of driving while using a cell phone, and is memorable enough to serve as a reminder every time a person enters his vehicle.
I agree with Jonathan Zittrain completely. I cant tell you how many times my computer has crashed. Just recently when turning this Open-Ed in, my computer decided to freeze and not save. Sometimes I feel like technology is getting way ahead of itself. I feel like we should always have a back up and somethings can be done like they were done "back in the day". We should also not be so depended. Technology should be looked at as a blessing or privilege not a need.
Sunday, July 19, 2009
27 July 2009
“Evil Spirits” is a compelling article by op-ed contributor James Abourezk challenging a major problem in our nation. This problem is alcohol abuse. In “Evil Spirits,” Abourezk specifically attacks President Roosevelt’s decision to abolish the buffer zone on the Great Sioux Reservation. Alcohol industries and politicians Abourezk tried to contact in the past say that the lack of a buffer zone does no harm to the community. Abourezk wittily shows that unless providing alcoholics and bootleggers with what they crave is harmless, these politicians and alcohol industries clearly do not see what is in the best interest of the reserve. Once Abourezk gives the alcohol facts in numbers, however, the readers faithfully believe in his side of the story. Four liquor stores in the small area of Whiteclay to support a whopping 24 people. Abourezk also notes that nothing good has come of removing the buffer zone besides monetary gain for the alcohol companies. In fact, the only things that continue to rise are family abuse and crimes.
This article is short, but, as Mr. Glenn once said, “Brevity is the soul of wit.” Abourezk definitely tries his best to prove Mr. Glenn right; each sentence has an obvious purpose, and no fluffy words appear to try to coax the reader. Abourezk gets straight to the point with every argument using past experiences and valuable data to support his arguments. He also does an excellent job of mixing tear-jerking evidence of abuse with indisputable and number-based evidence. Creating an even feeling throughout his article, Abourezk writes his paragraphs all at about the same length. He also uses differing sentence structures but never uses any sort of long, overdone sentences. His vocabulary matches his paragraphs and sentences; he uses an educated but not showy selection of words. Abourezk’s literary style compliments his structured ideas creating a strong and convincing article, “Evil Spirits.”
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
When reading about Issey's experience, I agree with President Obama with vanishing these nuclear weapons. Most nuclear weapons do unnecessary damage. For example, Issey's mom, she didn't have to die in this situation. If the weapons was weaker, more lives would have been saved. I personally believe no weapons should be used. In no way should anyone be harmed because its not our right to declare who lives or dies. That decision is not in our hands.
Monday, July 13, 2009
Although I have doubts of the impact this article will have on turning Detroit around, I cannot deny the artistic writing of the author. He began his piece with a personal story, instilling interest and a sense of connection in the reader. Throughout the passage, clever metaphors and witty remarks come into play, not only retaining reader interest, but also gently persuading in favor of his cause. By the end of the article, I am convinced that his ideas, albeit far-fetched, have some validity. Most of all, the article presents readers with hope that Detroit isn't falling forever, maybe just experiencing metamorphosis. My favorite parts of the article are the last two sentences because they are powerful while still containing humor and a sense of irony. Because the author ends his piece on this good note, readers are left with a positive take on his views.
Humanitarian aid is an increasingly popular topic in the media today, with every celebrity seeming to support their own cause. In his op-ed piece, Nicholas Kristof analyzes the dynamics of humanitarian aid at both the world and personal levels. At the G-8 summit, world leaders discuss a variety of topics, one of the most prevalent being humanitarian aid. Some countries present at the summit, including the
Kristof backs up his explanations with study results conducted by universities. In one such study, an overwhelming majority of bystanders helped an injured individual when they were the only witness. However, when more than one person was present, the number of Good Samaritans decreased to less than ten percent. Because of these study results from reputable institutions, Kristof’s argument is convincing. Kristof’s reasoning eventual boils down to an ultimate cause: human nature. His writing also follows a logical procession, and at the end offers his suggestions for increasing humanitarian contributions. The G-8 summit, currently being held in
Ehrenreich does a good job using a great deal of examples to emphasize her point that though the government can “talk the talk”, they can’t “walk the walk”. Ehrenreich’s arguments are very factual and to the point. Instead of just writing from her own point-of-view, she uses direct quotes and incorporates a story into the article which, in turn, supports her firm stance in the argument. Though most political writers only look at the big picture, Ehrenreich’s chose to dig deep and cover a real life story about things that most people and politicians choose to ignore.
Krugman uses this article as a "here's what's happening, what are you doing to fix it?" article. His analogy of boiling a frog gets across his hopelessness and view of the country's future.It is also a nice visual for the reader.He has a nice balance of facts and opinion.He ends the article by stating he doesn't know the solution, making the reader think about how they themselves might fix it, and again showing his hopelessness.
AP Language Arts
13 July 2009
In “The Way We Love Now,” Ross Douthat reveals how, despite the public’s love of scandalous romance, responsibilities and pressures drain today’s relationships of spark and compassion. Douthat uses examples from two different essayists, Cristina Nehring and Tsing Loh. Although these women have different points to make about dying love in today’s society, they both trace it back to pressure on families causing the love to seep out of relationships. While this is true on many levels, Douthat also makes an excellent and shockingly true distinction between the upper and lower classes regarding relationships. Although upper class citizens seem to support wild and reckless love, they tend to be more conservative with their own relationships. The lower class, on the other hand, tends to indulge in wild relationships and have many more children. Douthat uses these two points to prove an excellent realization. Upper class citizens who could benefit from having a more reckless love life do not, and lower class citizens who could benefit from being more conservative about their love lives do not. In essence, Ross Douthat argues that relationships may not be living up to peoples’ expectations because of the expectations of love and relationships already established in social classes.
Ross Douthat does a good job of arguing his points by using the outside opinions of well-known essayists. Without these examples, however, I find that his ideas do not make much sense. Even while reading through the second and third time, I find myself having to refer back to the first few paragraphs where the examples begin. This is also fairly difficult because I believe that Douthat could have done a better job of not making those first few paragraphs so complicated and jam-packed. His sentences are long and filled with rich vocabulary, but, because of all the different examples he throws in, the vocabulary does more to confuse than impress the reader. The structure of this article was also very hard to follow. Douthat seems to be so excited with his ideas that he forgets to organize his thoughts in an understandable way. The tone in this essay was not very strong. From what I could gather, Douthat uses an ironic tone. Although this tone is slight, Douthat supports it well by pointing out that love among different social classes today is very ironic.
Along with the economy, another major problem is climate change. The rise in temperatures could completely disrupt life as we know it, if we continue on our present path. Climate change is a creeping threat that won’t be apparent for decades, but, if we wait to act until the crisis is obvious, catastrophe will already be inevitable. The alarming thing is that so little is happening when the political situation seems to be favorable to action. It is clear that the government understands the environmental and economic issues perfectly well but they are unwilling to put plans into action to fight off disaster. If we don’t fix the problems now, America could be like the boiled frog, not realizing its danger until it is too late.
“Trials By Firefighter” feels as if the authors are trying to control your opinions bluntly. It is obvious that Guiner and Strum feel strongly about the issue, so much so that in many instances it felt as if they were fighting for a couple different issues instead of just focusing in on one and really going at it. At times throughout the article, it was a struggle to differentiate whether they were fighting because the tests were racist, illogical, or unneeded. The most troubling part as a reader comes with the last line, “In so doing, city officials demonstrate that their decisions are wiser than the Supreme Court’s.” In adding this last line to their article, it opened a whole new can of worms. Was the article talking about the issues within the test the whole time or was it trying, and epically failing, to make the reader realize the Supreme Court serves no actual justice when the city makes better judgment calls anyways?
Obama’s Big Missile Test
By Philip Taubman
A world without nuclear weapons is believed to be a world without war. This assertion has been made hypothetically for the past decade, yet it is only now within our reach. President Obama recently outlined a plan in Prague that might make this peaceful vision a reality. Many struggle, however, calling this vision, “peaceful.” Philip Taubman, author of the article Obama’s Big Missile Test, questions the validity of Obama’s attempts to remove all nuclear weapons off the face of the earth as well as whether or not his attempts are peaceful at all. His response to President Obama’s arms reduction is not stated plainly, yet the evidence he offers and the intended tone of the article reflect a negative stance on the issue. Taubman emphasizes how Obama has very little support from Congress and the Pentagon, and his influence on the periodic Nuclear Posture Review, a handbook issued by the Pentagon that regulates nuclear production, must be hindered. Taubman continues to stress that a world without nuclear weapons is not a peaceful world. A large nuclear stock has in previous years been an intimidation factor, especially during the Cold War. The United States has one of the largest and most advanced nuclear arsenals in the world, which despite the current economic turmoil has kept countries such as North Korea and Iran from taking over. Removing this arsenal would be devastating to not only our homeland security, but to the security of the world. Obama’s arms reduction plan seems irrational to Democrats and Republicans alike, and puts the well- being of our country at risk. His plan is raising concern to the public who are now wondering whose side Obama is on.
Although Philip Taubman did not openly state his opinion in the article, it can easily be inferred by his tone that he was concerned about the issue and disagreed with Obama’s plan. The article was well written and factual, and contained no opinionated statements. Taubman did, however, use factual evidence to reveal his opinion. A note at the bottom of the article stated that Philip Taubman is a consulting professor at Stanford’s Center for International Security and Cooperation. His position there seems to parallel with his perspectives on international security. His position also adds validity to his claims, because he must be knowledgeable about international security to work in that field. Taubman makes his opinion visible also by making slight jabs at Obama. He hints at Obama’s apparent lack of experience in foreign affairs, and mocks his vision of a world with no nuclear weapons. The article presents Obama as almost naïve. Each comment directed toward President Obama was, however, backed by fact.
Sunday, July 12, 2009
I believe Herbert makes a very good point in addressing the lack of positive results from Obama’s economic plans. I thought he does a really good job in pointing out the problem and offering a solution. He first supports his claim with statistics and then he explains why these statistics are important. He states that unemployment rates are important because a healthy economy needs people driving it. He also offers a solution to the problem; This solution he calls “rebuilding America”. In this proposal, Herbert affirms that the government should conduct programs that would get jobless people simple jobs such as repairing, designing, etc. Overall my beliefs are along with that of Herbert’s. I also believe that our economic problem could not be solved b just giving money to the free market, but rather it should be solved by getting people back into the free market.
Op - Ed Entry Four
July 12, 2009
Clean, Sexy Water
By: Nicholas D. Kristoff
Published: July 11, 2009
Even when he was left with nothing Scott Harrison truly gave back. A few years ago Scott Harrison wasn't a man who cared about anything but himself; but now he's running his own million dollar charity. While on a trip to South America he under went a spiritual crisis and decided to really give a helping hand. Mr. Harrison volunteered as a photographer for Mercy Ships,his experience while working with a boy who had a tumor that was literally suffocating him effected Mr. Harrison so much he decided to start a charity that would give clean water to the people that need it most. The charity does more than just give drinking water to these people, though. They supply latrines, they teach people how to wash their hands (which cuts back on forty-five percent of diseases), and the clean water helps keep children in school that would normally spend all day fetching clean water for their families. This charity makes sure every dollar donated goes straight to helping the cause. Mr. Harrison can make sure this happens because he uses his 500 most committed donors to covering all administrative cost. Mr. Harrison also is working on a way to show every single person (no matter how small their donation) how their donations help. He hopes to have a website up in september that using google earth will allow them to see how their money is helping these people. In three years Charity Water has managed to raise ten million dollars due to this marketing genius who uses the lastest social networking to get the message out about Charity Water. Charity Water is more than just a helping hand, the people behind Charity Water change lives.
The first article of Kristoff's that I read left me unsure of his ability to write consistently on one topic and make it interesting; with the article "Clean, Sexy Water" the title and the article are a hit and they're both intriguing. "Clean, Sexy Water" was brilliantly informative. The start of the article has a great pace; it sets the tone of the piece by appealing to the everyday audience and then switches the tone to a more enlightening earthy feel. Kristoff does a great job of explaining the charity, why the charity was started, the marketing, and how you can be a part of it. It's an article that will make you want to help Scott Harrison, his eleven employees, and his many volunteer workers. Kristoff writes about an extraordinary cause started by a man who had it all, lost it all, and got in all back again in the name of charity. This is a truly spectacular article.
I believe the author may have wanted to compare and contrast the two legend's deaths. They are, and will be, very similar characters in history. Although they came from two very different musical and ethnic backgrounds, Michael Jackson and Elvis Presley will be legends in the music and entertainment industry for a very long time. After his death, Elvis's manager was quoted saying, it's not the end. Likewise, Michael Jackson left over 200 tracks left unpublished. Even though Michael was a legend, he still has some very large shoes to fill if he is going to upstage Elvis.